Back to CaseSteps
FederalAssessmentsOfficial-source checkedAttorney review pending

What Can Someone Do if Their PATTERN Assessment Appears Incorrect?

The general path runs through the unit team first, then the Bureau of Prisons Administrative Remedy Program.

Time and credits Last reviewed: September 6, 2026

Share CaseSteps

Shares a link to this page and a short general description. Nothing about you is included.

Link shared: https://casesteps.org/resources/federal/pattern-assessment-appears-incorrect

Short answer

The Bureau of Prisons produces the assessment, so no one can recalculate it themselves. The general path is to ask the unit team which document reflects the current determination and what record information it drew on, raise an apparent error informally, and then use the Administrative Remedy Program in 28 C.F.R. part 542 if it is not resolved. Some concerns are record-correction questions rather than disagreements with the determination. CaseSteps does not review assessments, state deadlines, or draft filings.

Attorney review pending. This is general education, not legal advice.

Plain-English overview

PATTERN is the Bureau of Prisons risk and needs assessment tool. The Bureau of Prisons states that it currently uses PATTERN version 1.3 and that scores can change at periodic reassessment.

An assessment is generated from record information. When a person believes that information is wrong, the question is usually about the underlying record rather than about the tool itself.

The Bureau of Prisons operates a formal grievance process, the Administrative Remedy Program in 28 C.F.R. part 542. It is the general route for challenging a Bureau of Prisons determination after informal resolution with staff.

Why this matters

A recidivism-risk determination affects the additional five days of First Step Act credit and the separate question of applying earned credits, so an assessment built on an incorrect record can matter well beyond a number on a page.

What the rule generally means

There is no provision that lets a person recalculate their own assessment or substitute a different score. The Bureau of Prisons makes the determination.

What a person can generally do is ask which document reflects the current assessment, ask what record information it drew on, raise an apparent error informally with the unit team, and then use the Administrative Remedy Program if the issue is not resolved.

Part 542 sets out the steps and the time limits for that program. CaseSteps does not state deadlines, does not prepare a form, and does not evaluate whether a particular grievance would succeed.

Conditions or exceptions that change the answer

  • Some concerns are record-correction questions rather than disagreements with the assessment itself.
  • Some concerns relate to the needs assessment or security classification rather than to recidivism risk, and those are different determinations.
  • Timing matters: part 542 contains its own filing steps and time limits, which counsel or staff can identify.
  • Some questions belong with counsel or the court instead, particularly where the underlying record came from the presentence report.

Records to request or review

  • The document showing the current recidivism-risk determination and the two most recent assessments.
  • The needs assessment and current program assignments.
  • The FSA Time Credit Assessment.
  • Any Bureau of Prisons response already received about the assessment.
  • Do not upload any of these records to CaseSteps. Nothing here accepts files.

Questions for the unit team

  • Which document shows my current assessment, and when was it produced?
  • What information was that assessment based on?
  • When is the next reassessment scheduled?
  • If a piece of record information appears incorrect, how is a correction requested?
  • What is the informal-resolution step here before a formal remedy request?

Exactly where each statement above comes from — source checked: September 6, 2026

  • The Administrative Remedy Program lets a person seek formal review of an issue relating to any aspect of their own confinement, and a person may not submit a request or appeal on behalf of another person: Program Statement 1330.18 (January 6, 2014), section 1, quoting 28 C.F.R. § 542.10.
  • Informal resolution with staff ordinarily comes first, and the Warden is responsible for ensuring effective informal-resolution procedures are in place: Program Statement 1330.18, section 7, implementing 28 C.F.R. § 542.13. Some situations are excepted, including people in community corrections centers and issues the Warden waives as sensitive.
  • After informal resolution, a formal request is submitted on the appropriate form, referred to in policy as the BP-9: Program Statement 1330.18, section 8, implementing 28 C.F.R. § 542.14. That section also states a time limit for completing informal resolution and submitting the formal request, and provides for extensions in described circumstances.
  • The Bureau of Prisons policy directory listed Program Statement 1330.18 (January 6, 2014) as the operative Administrative Remedy Program policy when checked on September 6, 2026.
  • The current risk and needs assessment tool version is stated on the Bureau of Prisons PATTERN page, checked September 6, 2026.

What this reading does not do

CaseSteps does not state the filing deadline that applies to any individual, does not prepare a BP-9 or any other form, does not review an assessment, and does not predict an outcome. The deadlines and form names in current policy, and how they apply to a particular situation, are questions to raise with unit staff or counsel.

What CaseSteps cannot do

CaseSteps does not calculate credits, good-conduct time, a release date, a PATTERN score or a placement date.

CaseSteps does not decide whether anyone is eligible, does not review an individual record, and does not draft or file anything.

The Bureau of Prisons controls official sentence computation, assessments, program assignment, credit records and placement decisions. Individual questions belong with the unit team and with qualified counsel.

Questions to discuss with counsel

  • In general terms, what is the process for challenging a Bureau of Prisons determination?
  • Which records would show what my assessment was based on?
  • Is this a records-correction issue or a disagreement with the determination?
  • Are there time limits I should be aware of?
  • Is there any role for the court here, or is this entirely a Bureau of Prisons matter?

This is general federal legal education, not legal advice. Procedures and outcomes depend on the facts, the controlling law, court orders and local practices. Confirm deadlines and decisions with qualified counsel.

Was this page helpful?

Share CaseSteps

Shares a link to this page and a short general description. Nothing about you is included.

Link shared: https://casesteps.org/resources/federal/pattern-assessment-appears-incorrect

More federal foundations